Draftv0.1.0-alpha · revised 2026-08-01
Book V — Scientific Governance
Scientific governance does not mean rule by scientists. It means governance that behaves scientifically.
Traditional institutions can become trapped by prestige, political identity, administrative inertia, or self-preservation. Scientific governance begins from a different premise: that the institution is probably wrong about something important, and that the job of its structure is to find out what.
Public explanation: /spec/governance is linked from the governance section of the homepage. Governing proposal: IIP-0006.
Chapters
- 01Governing PremisesDraftThe four premises of scientific governance.
- 02Required DisclosuresDraftWhat governance must publish.
- 03Publication of FailureDraftNegative results carry equal status.
- 04Governance CaptureDraftDetecting and reversing capture.
- 05Transparent AssumptionsConceptTransparent Assumptions under scientific governance.
- 06Measurable OutcomesConceptMeasurable Outcomes under scientific governance.
- 07Evidence StandardsConceptEvidence Standards under scientific governance.
- 08AuditsConceptAudits under scientific governance.
- 09Model RevisionConceptModel Revision under scientific governance.
- 10Conflict DisclosureConceptConflict Disclosure under scientific governance.
- 11Independent ReviewConceptIndependent Review under scientific governance.
- 12AppealsConceptAppeals under scientific governance.
- 13Emergency PowersConceptEmergency Powers under scientific governance.
- 14Institutional ReplacementConceptInstitutional Replacement under scientific governance.
- 15Separation of PowersConceptSeparation of Powers under scientific governance.
Cite this page
ISILP. Book V — Scientific Governance. The Intelligentism Specification, version 0.1.0-alpha (revised 2026-08-01). https://intelligentism.isilp.org/spec/governance